An honest look at where each one fits. No trash talk — just the tradeoffs.
| DUCT | Heroku | Railway | Render | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting model | Your own server | Fully managed | Fully managed | Fully managed |
| Pricing | Flat €119/yr | Per dyno/mo | Usage-based | Per service/mo |
| Cost at 10 apps | Same flat fee | Scales up fast | Scales with use | Scales per service |
| You own the box | Yes | No | No | No |
| Status pages built in | Yes | Add-on | No | No |
| Revenue / MRR tracking | Yes | No | No | No |
| Deploy via AI (MCP) | Native | No | No | No |
| Self-healing deploys | Yes | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Vendor lock-in | None | High | Medium | Medium |
Heroku, Railway, and Render are excellent managed platforms. You push, they run it, and you never touch a server. That convenience is the product — and you pay for it per dyno, per service, or per unit of usage. The more you run, the more it costs, forever.
DUCT flips the model. It deploys to your own DigitalOcean droplet, so you own the infrastructure and the data. One flat fee covers your whole fleet — the tenth app costs the same as the first. You get the push-to-live convenience and the ownership.
The PaaS options are optimized for deploying one service well. DUCT is optimized for an operator running many: a fleet console, per-SaaS revenue tracking, an investor data room, public status pages, and a scoring arena that prices your shipping performance. It's an ops platform, not just a deploy button.
Full platform, your server, flat €119/yr for the first 100 founders.
See pricing →